UKRAINE MINISTRY OF FINANCE: STATEMENT RELATING TO SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT, 15 MARCH 2023
-
About Ministry
- Recruitment
-
Accountable agencies
- State Enterprises and Institutions Belonging to the Sphere of Management of the Ministry
- State Service for Financial Monitoring
- State Treasury
- The State Audit Service of Ukraine
- State Tax Service of Ukraine
- State Customs Service of Ukraine
- Personnel Audit Procedures of State Customs Service
- State Tax University
- Minfin Panel
-
Policy Issues
- Budget policy
- Tax Policy
-
Customs Policy
-
Customs Reform
- Common transit mode
- System of simplifications
- General declaration of arrival
- Authorized economic operators
- The only window for international trade
- Promoting the protection of intellectual property rights
- Qualification and reliability testing
- Functioning of the State Customs Service in the format of a single legal entity
-
Customs Reform
-
Accounting and Auditing
-
Accounting
- Introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards
- Accounting in Private Sector
- Accounting in the Public Sector
- Methodological Accounting Council under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (download a short description)
- IFRS Council under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (download a short description)
- Auditing
-
Accounting
- Debt policy
- Financial Policy
-
Financial Monitoring
- Statements and reports of international organizations
- Legislation
- International standards
- Methodological assistance (recommendations and explanations)
- Education, trainings and seminars
- Samples of drawing up a schematic representation of the ownership structure
- List of states (jurisdictions) that do not comply or improperly implement the recommendations of international and intergovernmental organizations involved in the field prevention and counteraction
- List of persons to whom sanctions have been applied
- List of terrorists
- Send a report on violation of the legislation in the field of prevention and counteraction to legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime, terrorist financing and financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
-
International Cooperation
- Partners
-
Cooperation in Attracting Financing from the International Financial Institutions
- Procedure for attracting funds of International Financial Institutions
- World Bank
- EBRD
- EIB
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
- KFW
- Register of Joint IFIs Projects at the Stage of Preparation and Implementation (information)
- International Technical Assistance (within the competence of the Ministry of Finance)
- Monitoring of international technical assistance projects
- Cooperation with the Development Partners
- International Tax Relations
- Development of Public Internal Financial Control (PIFC)
- Other Areas of Public Policy
- Public Finance Management Strategy (PFMS)
-
Legislation
-
Regulatory Activity
- reports_on_the_effectiveness_of_regulatory_acts_2023
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2022
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2023
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2022
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2022
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2022
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2021
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2021
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2020
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2019
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2019
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2019
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2018
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2018
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2018
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2017
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2017
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2017
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2016
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2016
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2016
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2015
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2015
-
Draft Regulatory Acts Discussion
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2023
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2022
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2021
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2020
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2019
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2018
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2017
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2016
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2015
- Draft Legislation
-
Regulatory Activity
-
Data
- Cooperation with Civil Society
- Press Center
The United Kingdom Supreme Court rules that russia’s US$3 billion Eurobonds case against Ukraine should be sent for a full public trial.
In a great victory for justice and the rule of law, the UK Supreme Court has today held that Ukraine’s defence of duress, based on russia’s threats of aggression against Ukraine, should be sent for a full public trial. More than seven years after russia commenced proceedings against Ukraine in England, this decision issued by the highest court in the UK vindicates Ukraine’s long-held position.
russia, acting through its proxy trustee, sought to persuade the English court to enter summary judgment against Ukraine without permitting its own conduct to be scrutinised. But the Supreme Court has rejected russia’s pleas and recognised the legitimacy of Ukraine’s defence.
Mr Justice Blair had already said in his first instance judgment that Ukraine’s case of duress “is plainly a strong one”, and that russia’s “threat of the use of force in 2013 has to be seen against the actual use of force in 2014”. The Supreme Court has now ruled that that strong defence should go to trial. The Supreme Court was not at this stage asked to consider russia’s illegal war against Ukraine, because the hearing of the appeals “concluded prior to russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022”, but Lord Carnwath of the Supreme Court said that russia’s subsequent behaviour could not realistically be ignored.
Time will tell whether russia has the courage to press its claim, now that it will have to make full disclosure regarding its actions towards Ukraine and account for its appalling behaviour at a public trial. The burden will be on russia to persuade the court that its threats “contributed nothing” to Ukraine’s decision to issue these weaponised bonds. The Supreme Court has said that Ukraine will succeed unless russia’s pressure is shown to have played no part in Ukraine’s decision.
All the evidence will be examined, and the world will be watching. Ukraine has truth and right on its side. In the courts, as on the battlefield, Ukraine will fight russia until the end, with complete belief that the ultimate victory will be Ukraine’s.
Slava Ukraini!